User talk:Zanimum/Archive 22/Archive 15

Archives
talk until 2004: 5 April, 9 June, 25 November talk until 2005: 15 September talk until 2006: 22 February, 30 May, 29 August, 4 November talk until 2007: 30 January, 30 November talk until 2008: 3 September talk until 2009: 12 October talk until 2011: 12 June talk until 2012: 31 October

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of sister cities in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fengcheng (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ankit Maity^Talk_Contribs 15:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

ViperSnake151  Talk  14:15, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello Zanimum. I've noticed you nominated Kingdom Hearts 3D: Dream Drop Distance for GA but are you sure it can become a GA? All the story section is unsourced while there is almost critical reception for the game. I recommend working more on the article using examples like Kingdom Hearts (video game) and Final Fantasy XIII before nominating it. Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep looks more suitable for a GA review than this one. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 00:38, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey Z, I wanted to let you know that I finally got around to responding to your feedback of your Joan Ganz Cooney review. Thanks for doing it, and my apologies for it taking so bloody long. BTW, I don't think it was a COI at all; the article as it currently stands is substantially different than before I got my hands on it. Thanks for the feedback, and let me know how I assist moving forward. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 00:51, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the pass, man! And for the Format article, too. ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Cosby in advertising at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Just letting you know that I've reviewed your GA nomination for 2011 royal tour of Canada. At this time, I don't think it's ready, since there are still a lot of issues identified during the peer review that need to be resolved. I encourage you to resolve those first, then renominate it for GA status. Edge3 (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ack, I forgot that review was requested, thank you for reminding me of its existence. I'll use that -- Zanimum (talk) 19:43, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have posted a review of Development of Duke Nukem Forever. Please address the remaining issues to have it pass GAN. Thanks. --Teancum (talk) 16:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey Zan, I was puttering about GAC and saw that your nominated Snuffy's Parents Get a Divorce. I was tempted to review it, but I suspect that even though you've taken it over, I wouldn't be objective. After it passes, I'll take a look at it and do an informal review if you like. There are two issues I think I can address now, though. You have a note at the bottom of the article that states that it was based upon the article at Muppet Wiki. I haven't compared the Wiki article with the one here at WP, but I would strongly advise against doing that. I mean, you can start at the Wiki, but the article here should be substantially different, so that you're not accused of plagiarism. I've only done a cursory review of the sources, but they look good, so it may not be a huge issue. I also think that to be comprehensive, you should expand the info about the recent divorce episode with Abby Cadabby. (Hmm, come to think of it, there should be an article about that episode, too, even if it's a stub.) Hope this helps.

I also wanted to check in with you about the GA articles you promised to review. I'm not in any huge hurry, but I wanted to remind you about them in case you forgot. Have a great weekend! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 18:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Christine... thanks for the comments on the episode description, I'll try and go through that sometime this week. I'll try and get to Sesame Street media soon, it seems relatively straight forward. I've finally deleted my review page for Influence, so the GAN will reset to unclaimed. There were a few things here and there that could be changed, but the prose and referencing was strong overall. That said, I found lots of things that the show has been influential with, and you talk about (multiculturalism, research based programming), you don't necessarily link back to how it influenced children's media. The critical reception section would make a strong Critical reception of Sesame Street article, but without linking things back to the title/topic, I couldn't pass it. Better off to try and see if someone else would. But anyway, I'll get around to "media" in a bit. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I haven't seen any comments on Talk:Towel Power/GA1 in two weeks, I know these things take time but, I just wanted to make sure you haven't forgotten about it. Cheers. --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 23:09, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ack, sorry, you pinned the nail on the head, I did forget. Some of the other reviews have been taking longer than I thought to resolve, and that mixed with work, I bit off more than I could chew. I'm starting now. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

No worries these things happen. I responded to your question on the review page. Thanks for taking on this review. Cheers --Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 00:24, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey. Just poking you that I did the review, nothing too big to fix. Wizardman 01:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello and thanks for creating this article. It's been tagged as needing more reliable references and of doubtful notability for 5 years now. Would you be able to look it over and see if you can improve it? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Boleyn... wow, I really don't remember creating that, but I'll try and dig around for sources after work. -- Zanimum (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey Zan, would you do a big huge favor for me? One of my projects, other than Sesame Street articles, is working on articles about Maya Angelou. As a matter of fact, the creation of a FT for her and her works is a long-standing, many-years-long WP goal for me. So you mind going here [1] and taking a look? This FLC, for List of honors received by Maya Angelou, is one of the last steps in that long process. I'd greatly appreciate it.

Also, the Sesame Street media article is still in need of your attention. Hey, if you're not gonna get to it anytime soon, could you withdraw your review offer, so that someone else can review it? Again, thanks so much. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:29, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

On 8 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bill Cosby in advertising, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Bill Cosby's approach to advertising is that he wants "to make the program interrupt the commercial"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Cosby in advertising. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Lord Roem ~ (talk) 08:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Benoit Rochon (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Wikimedia logos, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikimedia logos and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Wikimedia logos during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fátima Ptacek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Hudson's Bay store logo 2013.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Hudson's Bay 2013 retailer logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:48, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Hudson's Bay store logo 2013.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:48, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ah, I live to make obscure references to children's TV and music. When I respond to fellow editors to refer them to my talk page, I use "Here's the mail!" which is, of course, a reference to Blue's Clues. Just now, as I was writing this, a knock came at the door and it was a saleswoman. I swear, every time that happens, I want to run around the room yelling, "Salesman! Salesman!" like in Pee-wee's Playhouse. The title of this section is, of course, a reference to The Wiggles, as a reminder about your GA review of The Wiggles Pty Ltd. Have a nice day! ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 00:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's been over three weeks since you last posted to this GA review. Are you planning on returning to it soon, or should it go back into the GAN pool to find a new reviewer. Please let us know there. Many thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I certainly hope that the article doesn't return to the pool. It looks like the review is pretty much over and just needs to be passed. Zan! ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Zan, I really don't understand what's going on here. This article has been on hold for over a month now, and all it seems to need is your pass or not pass. I've addressed all your concerns, or at least I believe so. Could you please act on this, or at least communicate with me what I need to do? Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Have I done anything to make you upset with me? If so, how can I fix? Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 15:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Zanimum. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brampton Walk of Fame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhangra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. Just to let you know that there is a discussion at Boston Marathon bombings about admin editing through protection. GedUK  13:09, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Catherine Sutherland. Since you had some involvement with the Catherine Sutherland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — This, that and the other (talk) 08:48, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I noticed that you created the review page for the Lauren Conrad GAN about a week ago, and haven't edited the page since. I was just wondering if you were still taking on the review. Regards, WikiRedactor (talk) 15:40, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that, I took the article home (where I don't have internet), reviewed it that day, then forgot to post it online... anyway, it's up now. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:15, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing the article, I've made the corrections you asked for. When you get the chance, let me know what you think of the revisions. Thanks! WikiRedactor (talk) 22:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I found a reference to confirm the Teen Choice Awards in 2006 and 2007, and have added it to the page. WikiRedactor (talk) 20:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have replied to your post here. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:28, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

If there's any consequences to his putting magnets on cars, that would be encyclopedic. If anything, it could be a ticket. Maybe we can create a list of these things, but as text it doesn't add anything to the article about Ford. You'd hardly put this into an article about anybody, I think. Alaney2k (talk) 17:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey Zanimum! I hope you're still taking the article's GA Review. It's been there for about more than a week since you last posted. Thanks and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 14:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the pass! :) Mediran (t • c) 00:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Barker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Barker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FallingGravity (talk) 20:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Could you continue? — Robin (talk) 01:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

? — Robin (talk) 22:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

• Under the circumstances, and given that a similar situation occurred with Talk:The Wiggles Pty Ltd/GA1 a couple of months ago (see entry earlier on this talk page), if nothing has been done on the review by the end of the weekend, it can be considered abandoned. It's a shame, but it's unfair to the nominator to start a review and never come back to it and fail to reply to queries as to whether the review will be resumed. (I'll be posting a similar note on the review page.) BlueMoonset (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

New messages on the review page. — Robin (talk) 00:59, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Encore... — Robin (talk) 23:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Care to review another Glee GAN? :O

Thanks! Robin (talk) 18:55, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Don Bosco Catholic Secondary School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sun News

Taylor Beck (model) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kailua, Hawaii

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:44, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Rafael Nelson M. Aboganda, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Comment: yeah, I know the above is boilerplate; pardon me for templating a regular, but I did want to give you the notification. TJRC (talk) 22:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, thanks for taking on my GAN for Heidi Montag! (Perhaps you've noticed that I'm a fan of The Hills!) Just letting you know that I've addressed the issues you noted in the review, however I couldn't replace one of the references you suggested with another source because it appears to be the only place with that quote. And if you ever need a favor, don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page! Regards, WikiRedactor (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey Zan, I'm sure you're going to be unhappy with me, but I've reviewed this article for GA. To be honest, I'm kind of surprised; your work is usually much better. I recommend that you remove the nomination, work on the article more, and then resubmit it. Please let me know how I can assist. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian postage stamp of Acadian Deportation 1755–2005 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian postage stamp of Acadian Deportation 1755–2005 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian postage stamp of Polio Vaccination 1955–2005 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian postage stamp of Polio Vaccination 1955–2005 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, Zanimum, I hope you're doing well. :)

I wonder if you could help with a GA Review?

I saw that you reviewed a candidate lower-down on the queue at Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations/Topic_lists/Media_and_drama#Media_and_drama_2, the nomination for Heidi Montag.

I've placed a nomination which is now in the first-position in that queue, for Neville Page.

Perhaps you could have a look, and consider reviewing it for GA?

Thank you very much for your time, — Cirt (talk) 18:10, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thanks very much! — Cirt (talk) 22:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Have you had a chance to look over Neville Page and see if you think it's WP:GA quality worthy? — Cirt (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I heard that on Muppet Wikia, there is an unusual name of the Sesame Street song broadcasted in early 1996. It's not "Happy and Proud", it's "Birthday Emotions". Check it on here.

http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Birthday_Emotions

One more thing, in "Birthday Emotions, someone is hugging a teddy bear, brown with a red bow. Dcelano 00:35, (UTC)

Hi Dcelano! I'm trying to figure out the context of this comment, and why it was made here, not Muppet Wiki. Does it relate to one of the articles we have on Wikipedia? -- Zanimum (talk) 00:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have responded to your initial comments. Please let me know if there are any concerns that still need to be addressed. Thank you! --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:10, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for not noticing sooner... congrats, it's definitely a GA! -- Zanimum (talk) 23:36, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fantastic! Thank you so much for taking time to review the article. Much appreciated. --Another Believer _(Talk) 02:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mediran (t • c) 11:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

You have a new message again at Talk:The Clash of Triton/GA1. Thanks! :) Mediran (t • c) 10:45, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hey Zanimum! Thank you for passing The Clash of Triton article a while ago. I'm so grateful that the article passed your and the GA standards. Also, thank you for your invaluable changes that you've made especially in the plot section. Thanks again and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 10:38, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

The article International Street (Canada's Wonderland) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:International Street (Canada's Wonderland) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Responded to all notes. Alterations made accordingly.--Changedforbetter (talk) 07:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zanimum! Thank you once again for taking time to review an article I nominated. Anyway, I've already done what you've suggested. I hope you can pay it a visit because the review started almost two weeks ago. Thanks and have a nice day! :) Mediran (t • c) 12:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Christopher Hume. Since you had some involvement with the Christopher Hume redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Geo Swan (talk) 04:04, 3 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cheers Nicholas - the article is a spin off from Joburgpedia. I got interested in South Africa and there appears to be a lot of notable people without any article or just an unreferenced stub. Thanks Victuallers (talk) 15:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kirby: Fright to the Finish!! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirby: Fright to the Finish!! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EDITOREat ma talk page up, scotty! 02:40, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mediran (t • c) 00:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Pure Food Building at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:09, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:The Monster at the End of This Book Starring Lovable, Furry Old Grover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:PAMA Peel logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:01, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

On 9 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pure Food Building, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Pure Food Building (1922) at the Canadian National Exhibition was paid for in full by its exhibitors? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pure Food Building. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Mirvish Gallery, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Smith, Bob Murray and Robert Fulford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/David Mirvish Gallery at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

It is up for WP:GAC and I plan on doing my best to respond to feedback. I have not seen the play however, so my plot expansion will be limited. Are you interested in helping out in this regard.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:21, 26 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:32, 3 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thanks for starting a recategorization in the GA Film section--in retrospect, it's long overdue! I sorted A-B in support of your project this morning, and may try to do a few more letters later today. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wow, thanks! I was worrying that people would revert, not that someone would like the concept enough to help with the sort, and give a barnstar. (By the way, that anonymous IP was me too. First time in a while that I've edited while accidentally logged out.) -- Zanimum (talk) 14:04, 19 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

The article Chris Cerf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mostly unreferenced BLP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:05, 22 October 2013 (UTC) I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:05, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Your submission of David Mirvish Gallery at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Oreo Priest ^talk 12:49, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Your submission of David Mirvish Gallery at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Oreo Priest ^talk 00:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

On 29 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article David Mirvish Gallery, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the modern art David Mirvish Gallery was housed on land his father had intended as a parking lot for his discount store? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Mirvish Gallery. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:00, 31 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article David Bednar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edge3 -- Edge3 (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zanimum. As part of the GA review, I looked at the sources that you used for this article, and I'm concerned that David Bednar might not meet our notability requirements. I'm going to file an AfD to see what the community consensus is. Unfortunately, this means that I will fail the GA nomination at this time. However, I recognize that you've waited so long for this review, and that you've made a significant contribution to the article, so I would be happy to review the second GA nomination if the AfD is closed as "keep". Regards, Edge3 (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Bednar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bednar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edge3 (talk) 22:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

The article David Bednar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:David Bednar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edge3 -- Edge3 (talk) 22:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 01:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi-I came across an article you first started Willows, Wisconsin about Barbie that was turned into a redirect. I turned it back to an article after I found an article from the Wisconsin Historical Society about the Barbie doll and being from fictional community of Willows, Wisconsin. Please feel free to look at it-thanks-RFD (talk) 12:29, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samantha Dodd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Dodd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 19:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samantha Dodd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samantha Dodd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Michig (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Zanimum. As you may have noticed, there was no consensus on the AfD for David Bednar. I concede that the argument for deletion wasn't very strong, so if you renominate the article for GA status, I would be willing to complete the review. However, I won't be able to review it until early December, due to the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday in the US. Regards, Edge3 (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
99		Beauty and the Beast: Belle's Magical World (talk)						Add sources
2		Eric Cunningham (talk)						Add sources
74		Badroulbadour (talk)						Add sources
2,864		True (Avicii album) (talk)						Add sources
531		Black British (talk)						Add sources
1		Jim Renwick (Canadian politician) (talk)						Add sources
164		Aberystwyth University (talk)						Cleanup
1		Kaye Sargent (talk)						Cleanup
11		Pardon for Morant, Handcock and Witton (talk)						Cleanup
14		Antonio Brufau Niubó (talk)						Expand
4,932		Sam & Cat (talk)						Expand
670		Tenkai Knights (talk)						Expand
219		Retail loss prevention (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
398		Hazel McCallion (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
604		Conservative Party of Canada (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
80		PhotoRealistic RenderMan (talk)						Merge
297		Letterboxing (filming) (talk)						Merge
0		Robert Brisco (disambiguation) (talk)						Merge
1		Ted W. Kulp (talk)						Wikify
2,236		Gerrymandering (talk)						Wikify
39		'N Sync (album) (talk)						Wikify
2		ABA Chemicals (talk)						Orphan
3		Nishiyuu (talk)						Orphan
1		Breznay (talk)						Orphan
9		Monica (automobile) (talk)						Stub
2		Musikk Fra Hybridene (talk)						Stub
9		HMCS York (talk)						Stub
8		Forward Operating Base Delhi Massacre (talk)						Stub
1		George Fulford (talk)						Stub
13		Neo da Matrix (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zanimum ! I just wanted to thank you for taking up the review of "Can't Get You Out of My Head" (and passing it!). The nomination had been lying around for too long, but thankfully you took it up and what a clean and great review you had conducted seeing that the article is very large. It is Kylie's signature song and one of my personal favourites and I'm very happy and grateful that it is a GA now! Thank you so much! :) --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:52, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quick question, you finished with the review? I would like to get working to correct the deficiencies you have found. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 18:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, yes, that's what I was implying with "I think that's it for the article." -- Zanimum (talk) 13:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fini --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 20:22, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, you wouldn't mind closing this out? I have finished with the fixes you asked for. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 22:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Can you show why this song is notable enough for a stand alone article? right now all I see is youtube and itunes references. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

CNET, CTV News, ABC News, The Independent, New York Post, Billboard, Entertainment Weekly, Khaleej Times, Baltimore Sun, Daily Beast, BuzzFeed, Huffington Post, Jezebel, Toronto Sun, PopSugar, Herald Sun. Those are just media outlets I recognize the name of, and know have articles on Wikipedia. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article David Mirvish Gallery you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ammodramus -- Ammodramus (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

The review's up; I apologize for the delay in getting it there. The article's definitely got GA potential, but there are some issues that need to be addressed. Look forward to working with you on this-- Ammodramus (talk) 15:15, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Are you going on with this? It's been a week... Prιsm △ 15:35, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Zanimum! I hope you are still reviewing and not forgetting SpongeBob SquarePants (season 4). Thanks. Mediran (t • c) 03:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ford Nation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Taylor Trescott -- Taylor Trescott (talk) 03:42, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

The article David Mirvish Gallery you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:David Mirvish Gallery for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ammodramus -- Ammodramus (talk) 15:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not to press you, but are you going to be able to resume work on the Mirvish Gallery article soon? Your contribution history doesn't show a lot of recent activity, which I hope means that you were having a busy and enjoyable holiday with little time to spare for matters Wikipedial. Now that we're slogging into 2014, though, I'd like to see some progress on this article: I'm reluctant to take on another GAR or embark on any other kind of major WP project while this is hanging fire. Ammodramus (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hope that your gas, electricity, and Internet access are restored. Any chance of progress on the DMG article soon? Ammodramus (talk) 14:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - You are invited!

File:Csaky madonna.jpg

Hi Zanimum! The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 across the United States and Canada - including Toronto! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join! Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors. Bring a friend and a laptop! Come one, come all! Learn more here! SarahStierch (talk) 08:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Excuse me, but it's been a week. I just want to know if you're finishing it - if you don't have the time, ask another reviewer or something, I don't mind. Prism △ 11:18, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mediran (t • c) 08:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, same to you! -- Zanimum (talk) 17:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
273		Merida (Disney) (talk)						Add sources
66		Kilala Princess (talk)						Add sources
31		Son (TV series) (talk)						Add sources
64		20 Dakika (talk)						Add sources
13		Mirvish Productions (talk)						Add sources
1		Ponca City Public Schools (talk)						Add sources
168		TeraCopy (talk)						Cleanup
24		Gurumin: A Monstrous Adventure (talk)						Cleanup
749		Under the Mistletoe (talk)						Cleanup
629		Mississauga (talk)						Expand
4		Brampton Fall Fair (talk)						Expand
1,304		Emblem3 (talk)						Expand
85		Technological and industrial history of 20th-century Canada (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
18		Jobs and Growth Act (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
77		Toronto City Council (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
24		Bramalea, Ontario (talk)						Merge
258		Pocahontas (Disney) (talk)						Merge
822		Aurora (Disney) (talk)						Merge
110		Nuchal cord (talk)						Wikify
32		The Sword of Etheria (talk)						Wikify
5		Dorothy Dobbie (talk)						Wikify
0		Río Tus (talk)						Orphan
1		Jen Horsey (talk)						Orphan
1		Antonio de Arfian (talk)						Orphan
4		Brampton Arts Council (talk)						Stub
1		Harry Chadwick (talk)						Stub
40		FF Jaro (talk)						Stub
3		Halloween Party Songs (talk)						Stub
915		Subway Surfers (talk)						Stub
34		General Cinema Corporation (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:02, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Zanimum, it's been a couple of weeks since the nominator responded to the issues raised in your review. Will you be able to get back to it soon to see whether it's ready for listing or needs more work? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:15, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Zanimum, it's been over a month since your last post to this review, and nearly that long since Mediran responded to your concerns. As soon as you return, please take a look at this one, and see whether it's ready to be listed or it needs more work. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:36, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Television for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 00:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Zanimum, it sounds like you're overwhelmed at the moment, since you've just said as much when you posted a 2ndopinion request for Dewey Decimal Classification in the hopes that someone would finish the review for you. Can you please do the same with Roar? Or, if you don't have time, I'm happy to post a request for you. Thanks, and I hope things get better for you soon. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
13		Conklin Shows (talk)						Add sources
4		World's Finest Shows (talk)						Add sources
7		New Democratic Party candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election (talk)						Add sources
153		Legislative Assembly of Ontario (talk)						Add sources
603		Military history of Canada during World War II (talk)						Add sources
16		Toronto Theatre District (talk)						Add sources
7,232		The Snow Queen (talk)						Cleanup
478		Artificial gravity (talk)						Cleanup
27		Eglinton Avenue (talk)						Cleanup
13,717		Katy Perry (talk)						Expand
8		Green Party of Canada candidates, 2004 Canadian federal election (talk)						Expand
260		Mulan (Disney character) (talk)						Expand
50		Sung-through (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
109		Brigitte Gabriel (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
57		History of cities in Canada (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
684		Snow White (Disney) (talk)						Merge
12,538		2014 North American cold wave (talk)						Merge
80		Peel District School Board (talk)						Merge
15		Truman Bradley (actor) (talk)						Wikify
37		Ernie Eves (talk)						Wikify
70		Soft sell (talk)						Wikify
5		Brian Lilley (talk)						Orphan
4		Binagadi asphalt lake (talk)						Orphan
7		Game Xtreme 5 (talk)						Orphan
1		Al Kolyn (talk)						Stub
2		George Wardrope (talk)						Stub
1		Karl Kenneth Homuth (talk)						Stub
42		The Boob (talk)						Stub
1,652		John Button (racing driver) (talk)						Stub
2		Imperoyal, Nova Scotia (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:40, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Furey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Grant Mitchell (politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Jane Cordy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Jim Munson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Joseph A. Day (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Larry Campbell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Libbe Hubley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Lillian Dyck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Maria Chaput (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Marie Charette-Poulin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Mobina Jaffer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Nick Sibbeston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Pana Merchant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Percy Downe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Pierrette Ringuette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Sandra Lovelace Nicholas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Terry Mercer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

Wilfred Moore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to James Cowan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

There's been no progress on the David Mirvish Gallery GA nomination in something like a month and a half. Are you interested in continuing with it? If so, please let me know and let's get back to it; otherwise, I'll close it and let you renominate it when you're better situated to work on it. Ammodramus (talk) 05:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi there - I'll start by saying, trout me if I got this wrong. It appeared to me that your GA1 review had ended. I was able to reserve the GAN as a GA2. After starting the review tonight, I re-read the entire talkpage, and now I'm not so sure that your GA1 actually ended. Please let me know, and let's figure out what should happen next. --Rosiestep (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, I see two earlier notes on this talkpage regarding this article's GA1 so I'm thinking you were ok with discontinuing it. But I'll leave the trouting option on the table for now. :) --Rosiestep (talk) 05:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article Ford Nation you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ford Nation for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Taylor Trescott -- Taylor Trescott (talk) 04:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article David Mirvish Gallery you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:David Mirvish Gallery for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ammodramus -- Ammodramus (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
526		Jean Chrétien (talk)						Add sources
		Stephen Greene (talk)						Add sources
		Dutch municipal elections, 2010 (talk)						Add sources
		Senate of Canada (talk)						Add sources
20		2004 in Canada (talk)						Add sources
5		Star candidate (talk)						Add sources
4		Bernard Poulin (talk)						Cleanup
14		MDA Space Missions (talk)						Cleanup
		We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together (talk)						Cleanup
69		Scouts Canada (talk)						Expand
		The Next Step (2013 TV series) (talk)						Expand
		Media in Peel Region (talk)						Expand
		Party Whip (Canada) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Kirby: Right Back at Ya! (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
527		Kirby (character) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		History of Nova Scotia (talk)						Merge
		Indian Register (talk)						Merge
955		Miley Cyrus discography (talk)						Merge
		Eugene Whelan (talk)						Wikify
5		History of the Green Party of Canada (talk)						Wikify
		Alexander Hamilton McDonald (talk)						Wikify
		Isabel Metcalfe (talk)						Orphan
1		Besides, the Wench Is Dead (talk)						Orphan
4		Abu Ratib (talk)						Orphan
6		Asha Seth (talk)						Stub
2		Rose-Marie Losier-Cool (talk)						Stub
7		Denise Batters (talk)						Stub
		Madison Riley (talk)						Stub
		Suzanne Duplessis (talk)						Stub
483		Dan River (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gurn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [Tinker Bell]] at Disneyland theme park inflates her cheeks and sticks her thumbs under her ears.]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article Ford Nation you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ford Nation for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 22:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article Canadian Association of Promotional Marketing Agencies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication or evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 03:10, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Olympians and Paralympians from Peel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Still waiting for you reply on this DYK nomination template. Hope to see a response from you soon. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

• It seems a shame that this may have to miss the Paralympics, too, but your lack of response is making that increasingly likely. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Im wondering if you would be interested in reviewing the GA request at From Here to Eternity the Musical, or know someone who might.Blethering Scot 17:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I've now replied to the majority of your comments at Talk:From Here to Eternity the Musical/GA1.Blethering Scot 20:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have now replied to all, a couple of which need your further comments. Thanks.Blethering Scot 22:35, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I believe that I've addressed to your concerns. Are there any additional issues, or other suggestions or comments that I can take care of?--ColonelHenry (talk) 17:24, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the delay, promoted! -- Zanimum (talk) 16:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for the GA review for Yours Truly (Ariana Grande album). I very much appreciate you taking the time to review it and the kind words and friendly attitude really goes a long way. I hope to run into you on another GA down the line as you are one of the best reviewers I have had. STATic message me! 21:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking interest in reviewing the article. However, I have also noticed that you are currently reviewing Anna (Disney). I just wanted to let you know that it is quite alright for you to complete your review on Anna before you begin mine. Please, do whatever is easiest for you :)--Changedforbetter (talk) 00:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've actually mostly finished your review overnight. It was a lot more straightforward than Anna, less revisions. -- Zanimum (talk) 12:40, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Noticed. Changes made.--Changedforbetter (talk) 23:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zanimum. It's been a week since I updated Talk:Canadian Football League in the United States/GA1. Just wondering if you would have a chance to look at it again. I did have a question on one ref. Thanks. Dontreadalone (talk) 14:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For being a very conscientious and hard working reviewer of WP:GA nominations. Especially so for reviewing From Here to Eternity the Musical. Blethering Scot 17:15, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again for your input so far. I'm sure that being an admin often keeps you busy, though can you take a look now and see how it looks after the suggestions you gave? Look forward to your response and further input..... XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 03:03, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading File:Shallowhalmovieposter.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shizhao (talk) 01:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry if this message troubles you, but it's been nearly a month since I nominated Anna (Disney) for good article status. I know this is the first article that I did all the development by myself, so there must be a lot of issues scattering from beginning to end. And I'd love to hear from you and hope you continue to instruct me what else I need to revise. Thanks. Quenhitran (talk) 15:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		Susan Fennell (talk)						Add sources
		David Croll (talk)						Add sources
		Ray Perrault (talk)						Add sources
		2005 in Canada (talk)						Add sources
		Livent (talk)						Add sources
		Kong Le (talk)						Add sources
		Crimea (talk)						Cleanup
		Conservatism in Canada (talk)						Cleanup
		League of Legends (talk)						Cleanup
		Tiana (Disney) (talk)						Expand
		Needle exchange programme (talk)						Expand
		2nd Canadian Parliament (talk)						Expand
		Eglinton Crosstown line (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Jim Karygiannis (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Senators of the 39th Canadian Parliament and same-sex marriage (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Disney's Mulan (talk)						Merge
		Benefit fraud (talk)						Merge
		Precious (film) (talk)						Merge
		Nick Kouvalis (talk)						Wikify
		Bryan Fuller (talk)						Wikify
		Tattoo (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Wikify
		Roar (Axwell and Sebastian Ingrosso song) (talk)						Orphan
		Kurt Ucko (talk)						Orphan
		Tus River (talk)						Orphan
		James Murdock (talk)						Stub
		Swizzling (computer graphics) (talk)						Stub
		Tablet (confectionery) (talk)						Stub
		Angelo Hays (talk)						Stub
		Victor Oh (talk)						Stub
		Michel Biron (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Zanimum. First, thank you again for the reviews and help! Second, yeah, it's very close, and I'll try to get other episodes to GA. Mr. Monk and the End is the most easy to do due to the extensive coverage it gained. However, I think I'll have to strive to get the other to GA status. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have nominated this article for Did you know, which will hopefully result in it appearing on the main page. The link is Template:Did you know nominations/The 37's. I know you didn't nominate it, but you did a fair bit of work on it. Thanks, Matty.007 20:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Zanimum. You have new messages at Matty.007's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Oh wow, that's quite unexpected! Thanks! I'm so glad that GAs are now eligible for DYKs, it's a great way of showcasing articles once they've flowered. -- Zanimum (talk) 13:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Greetings! A proposal has been made at Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton#Requested move 8 to change the title of the article, Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton. This notification is provided to you per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification, because you have previously participated in a discussion on this subject. Cheers! bd2412 T 10:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hey, any updates on the "E.T." review :)? Thanks again!! Giacobbe ^talk 16:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

All changes that you requested have been done :)! Giacobbe ^talk 20:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Took some work, but now we've done it :D! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 23:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I see that you've taken an interest in Summer Mortimer? What a funny coincidence, she's like family to me, known her since birth lol, one of my best friends. Giacobbe ^talk 04:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

@(CA)Giacobbe: Oh wow, small world!

My dad runs a non-profit art group, and as a result, a gallery space. Before the Vancouver Paralympics, I got in contact with the CPC, and they endorsed a display of Paralympic sport themed art our adult and youth members were planning. So then back before the London Games, I was searching the CPC website whether any of the Canadian athletes did art as a hobby. There was one man who drew cartoon art, and Summer, who collaborated with her sister on that kids' book. We never did contact her (incidentally, her drawing ability has grown leaps and bounds since the book, if her Twitter feed is any indication,) but I decided to create an article on her on Wikipedia. It was a fortunate random pick too, considering how well she did in London.

That's totally cool that you're such good friends, what are the odds? Very cool!

If she ever wants to have input into the article, let me know. I managed to connect with her parents around the time of the 2012 Paralympics, and they were able to point out a few errors in the article, things that articles claimed or implied that weren't actually the case. -- Zanimum (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks for your review of Martin Miller. Unfortunately I have been unable to find better sources for the article, so I imagine the best way to proceed is to close the review as a fail. Thank you for your time, C679 14:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

After "E.T." previously failed GA twice (one of which was a withdrawal), I speak for myself and Giacobbe when I say THANK YOU FOR PASSING :D! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 01:35, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

@XXSNUGGUMSXX: @(CA)Giacobbe: Well, thank you for persevering and putting so much effort into cleaning it up! -- Zanimum (talk) 01:38, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Of course :). XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 01:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, yeah, it's always interesting creating some wikidrama. I reverted my edit myself, I figured it was easier creating a firestorm (I mean, seriously, people have gone to ARBCOM over something as silly as this). With that being said, feel free to undo my undo or get someone else to do it. -- Tawker (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

On 11 April 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Flaherty, which you recently nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

ThaddeusB (talk) 03:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for picking this up. If you think the article should be nominated for A-class or even FA, please let me know. I don't want to settle for GA if I don't have to. If not, then any suggestions to bring it up? I've literally wrote everything I could find about this movie, without being too excessive. There's only one other bit of info I've been meaning to add and that is about the poster art. Thanks, again. JeremeK (talk) 02:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I finished the citations. Took a while!! Thanks for your help! JeremeK (talk) 04:59, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zanimum and thanks for being willing to review Sip 'n Dip Lounge for GA. FWIW and FYI, I am in the wikicup and hoping to get all the current stuff I have in the queue done in time to claim points for this round (I'm not doing particularly well in point land...). So once you post your comments, I'll get on them just as fast as I can! Thanks! Montanabw^(talk) 21:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you again for your GA review! Much appreciated! Montanabw^(talk) 23:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Also, if you like to review articles about bars and such, another user pinged me that they had three GANs languishing for lack of reviewers, one which is Mary's Club. (I am reviewing a different GAN by this editor) - if you are interested, just an FYI. Montanabw^(talk) 06:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
595		New Democratic Party (Canada) (talk)						Add sources
163		B5 (group) (talk)						Add sources
95		Bert Berns (talk)						Add sources
42		Monk (season 6) (talk)						Add sources
364		Politics of Canada (talk)						Add sources
13		2002 in Canada (talk)						Add sources
13		Mr. Monk Gets a New Shrink (talk)						Cleanup
20		Academy Color Encoding System (talk)						Cleanup
58		MyPaint (talk)						Cleanup
12		New Democratic Party candidates, 2004 Canadian federal election (talk)						Expand
14		2009 in Canada (talk)						Expand
14		2003 in Canada (talk)						Expand
167		Hazel McCallion (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
703		Conservative Party of Canada (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
8		The Eyeopener (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
2,817		G8 (talk)						Merge
281		Tim Russ (talk)						Merge
68		Pratyangira (talk)						Merge
8		SAG Foundation (talk)						Wikify
143		Annabel Giles (talk)						Wikify
18		John Turmel (talk)						Wikify
3		Fonderie Nationale des Bronzes (talk)						Orphan
2		Jeff Wachtel (talk)						Orphan
9		African Safari Club (talk)						Orphan
1		Joan Neiman (talk)						Stub
9		JoAnne Buth (talk)						Stub
6		David Wells (politician) (talk)						Stub
2		Laurie Lambert (talk)						Stub
13		Don Plett (talk)						Stub
3		Connor Grimes (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:11, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi - you aren't alone. But that was the wrong page, I've raised this at WP:TECHPUMP#Citation template in RefToolbar sometimes disappears. Dougweller (talk) 05:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

On 19 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The 37's, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the episode "The 37's" was the first time in a Star Trek series that a Federation starship had landed on a planet's surface? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The 37's. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

slakr^\ talk / 09:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Where is this review up to? Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:08, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people from Brampton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Lynch and William Lawson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zanimum, I know you're busy but I was wondering if you've had a chance to look at sheng nu lately? I left some general comments at Talk:Sheng nu/GA1 regarding the name since they come up frequently. Cheers, Mkdw^talk 15:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Went over your feedback and improved the article. I did have a comment and a question when you have a chance. Cheers, Mkdw^talk 03:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Zanimum:, know you're busy but just wanted to get your feedback on the last two points of your GA Review. Cheers, Mkdw^talk 16:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Your submission of List of Olympians and Paralympians from Peel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 23:28, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Where is this review up to? Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:34, 3 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I don't suppose that I could talk you into reviewing B2 (classification)? Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Freedom from Want (painting)/GA2 has gone over 2 weeks without any comment.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing Pattycake and passing the article. I'll keep trying to improve it. FYI... User:Legobot does most of the GA tasks now, so you don't need to add the GA icon to future reviews. If you do, there's a possibility it could cancel out the nominator notification process. I'm going to raise this issue on the GA talk page right now as we have very poor documentation on the process (and it seems to change every week). Viriditas (talk) 02:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

You mentioned a way to get rid of the ref group, but I couldn't figure out how. By subdivided to its own area you mean breaking the refs up and insert to different areas? P.S. I did not add this ref group, therefore I myself don't know their content. Forbidden User (talk) 18:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's about a week now. Please reply. Meanwhile, I've fixed the problems you mentioned in the GA review. Could you please check the article again? Opinions welcomed! Forbidden User (talk) 08:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I think I've solved the problem above, as well as other problems you raised in the GA review. Do you mind spending some time to give further review on the page?Forbidden User (talk) 12:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

You seem to be working on some GA reviews these days. I hope you haven't forgotten this one. Sorry for spending a whole week on fixing stuff, but now I think I've completed it. Please, do check out the article and give comments on the review page. Any opinion is appreciated. Thanks!Forbidden User (talk) 14:59, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Looking forward to yet another Good Article review from you :) --Changedforbetter (talk) 05:40, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, Bluemoonset left a note for you at the DYK nom for the article on May 18, but I see the article hasn't been edited since May 11. Were you thinking of doing anything further on the nom? Either way, if you leave a note at the DYK discussion, it could help editors monitor what's happening... Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

• Just to let you know that I'm closing the nomination as unsuccessful. It's been open for over three months, which is far too long. Furthermore, you've been active since I pinged you on May 18, yet there has been no response on the nomination template nor, as hamiltonstone notes, any edits on the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Universal Fund for Suffering Children requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

For putting up with me and Red in the Red Skelton GA review.:) I started working with the article some time ago and needed to stop because everywhere I was trying to add refs, it came up copyvio. :( The issue turned out to be foundational and went back some years. There wasn't much left to it after that had to go, so I started trying to get it back to B article status. Coming back to it recently, we found that both his official website and another online source had copied our content and labeled it with their own copyrights. :/

You mentioned that you'd like to see someone write an article about the bomber Skelton collected money to pay for via his radio show. I found some news stories about the meeting of Skelton and the pilot (this man was the third and last one) which go into a bit of history about the action the bomber saw. I'll post the news story links to the article's talk page in case it might get someone interested in making a start at an article about the plane. Thanks again for your help! We hope (talk) 13:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article Agincourt Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN 317,425 sq ft mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 01:49, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zan, hope all is well with you. Would you mind helping me out? My most recent FAC [2] is languishing and in danger of failed due to lack of support. For some reason, many of my FACs seem to do that; I've found that soliciting assistance helps. Thanks, I appreciate it. Let me know how I can assist you. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of people from Mississauga may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Ryan Munce]] (b. 1985), hockey goaltender)
• (basketball)|Andrew Nicholson]], currently a Power Forward for the [[Orlando Magic]] of the [[NBA]<ref>{{cite news|title=Hoops star gives back|url=http://www.mississauga.com/sports-story/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Haye. Waxaan ahay steward. Xeerka cusub ee ku saaban in laga taqaluso "xuquuq hore" (Maamul, bureaucrat, IWM) kuna tiirsan kulanka bulshada ugu dambayn. Sida uu qabo xeerkaan, stewards waxay dabagal ku samaynayaan maamulka' firfircoon ee wikiga taa soo aan ku jirin xeerka firfircoonida.

Waana kuwa yeeshay sifooyinkaan (aan waxba bedelin iyo gudagalid la'aan dhaqdhaqaaq 2 sanoadod gudahood) ee wikiga, kuwaasoo kala ah Maamuleyaal. laga soo bilaabo sowiki aan lahayn masuuliyad gaara' howsha soo bandhigista xuquuqda, waana mid lagu dabaqayo hab caalami ah.

Haddii aad dooneeysid inaad sii haysato xuquuqdaada, waa inaad soo ogaysiisaa bulshada maamulaha ayaa ii soo diray macluumaadkaan taasoo ku cadeeyneeyso in aadan lahayn wax dhaqdhaqaaq ah si looga wadahadlo arrinkaas. Ka gadaal markii ay ka wada doodaan mujtamacaada, hadii ay bulshadaada ay doonayaan in aad sii haysato xilka, fadlan kala soo xiriir stewards m:Stewards' noticeboard, iyo linkiga dooda bogga gaarka ah ee aad doodu ka dhacday, kuwaasoo cadeeyey in ay doonayaan inaad sii wadato howshaada, iyagoo ku muujinaya in ay jirto baahi ah inaad sii joogto si aad usii haysato xuquuqdaan.

Haddii aan nahay stewards waxaan soo gudbin doonaan jawaabaha. Hadii aaneey dhicin wax jawaab ah bil gudaheed, waxaan guda gali doonaan in aan sii wadno in lagaa xayuubiyo xilka ama maamulka. Haddii laga shakiyo, waxaan guda gali doonna diyaarinta in laga dhiidhiyo waxaana ku celin doonaan mujtamacaada si ay uga faaloodaan. Haddii aad qabto wax su'aal ah, fadlan nagala soo xiriir m:Stewards' noticeboard.

Sidaas iyo nabad gelyo, Rschen7754 03:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Yorkdale Shopping Centre page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

This review hasn't seen much activity lately. Are you going to continue with this or should it just be closed as unsuccessful? SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 23:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

No need to hurry, man. I've addressed anything he raised, and I will continue doing so. These days I'm rather concentrated on Walt Disney, and so the time isn't so tight. There is no time limit.Forbidden User (talk) 10:51, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
103		Beauty and the Beast: Belle's Magical World (talk)						Add sources
10		The Mob Song (talk)						Add sources
27		Down and Outing (talk)						Add sources
1		Brampton North (provincial electoral district) (talk)						Add sources
62		Gurbax Singh Malhi (talk)						Add sources
79		International Blind Sports Federation (talk)						Add sources
318		We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together (talk)						Cleanup
4,301		Maleficent (talk)						Cleanup
13		The Hugga Bunch (talk)						Cleanup
1,073		IOS 8 (talk)						Expand
322		Pete (Disney) (talk)						Expand
4		Canadian federal election results in Brampton, Mississauga and Oakville (talk)						Expand
1,021		The Crucible (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
72		Betel nut beauty (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
86		Dinosaur Planet (TV series) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
83		Frozen Heart (talk)						Merge
21		Parliament of Ontario (talk)						Merge
2,533		My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (talk)						Merge
3		Bruce South (talk)						Wikify
7		Jim Abbott (politician) (talk)						Wikify
25		Monsieur Hire (talk)						Wikify
4		Attaché Temporaire d'Enseignement et de Recherche (talk)						Orphan
3		Addtech (talk)						Orphan
1		Antoine Yart (talk)						Orphan
10		Chinguacousy Township, Ontario (talk)						Stub
1		Brampton South (provincial electoral district) (talk)						Stub
2		Laura Branchaud (talk)						Stub
1		Lynne Beecroft (talk)						Stub
39		In Technicolor (talk)						Stub
2		Jean Major (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Zanimum. I've worked on Mr. Monk Takes Manhattan and had difficult to find info on a statement (tagged with "citation needed") and on production in general. I saw you cited Monk: The Official Episode Guide, and I wonder if it can be helpful here? Also, you didn't specified the page from where you took that info. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 05:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Gabriel Yuji: Good to hear from you! I'm 99% sure that I got the information from Google Books' snippet view search. It's page 224, which seems to be showing up for me. (Until now, I totally didn't connect your Ganga Bruta article with the Monk articles.) -- Zanimum (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I was hoping you had the book but the page already helps me a lot. (Haha why not? Prepare to see even more unconnected articles written by me). Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 01:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Draft:Ward 2 Etobicoke North page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zanimum,

Thank you for your initial comments on the Scarborough Day School GA review. I replied to them, and await further response.

Thanks again,
--ɱ (talk) 15:06, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I can see from your contributions log that you've been editing today. If you're too busy at the moment, please tell me. If you'd rather not finish the review, although I would be very glad if you did finish it, I'll renominate it for another reviewer.

Respectfully,

--ɱ (talk) 20:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Ɱ: Hi... sorry for pausing mid-review, I will get back to it in the near future. Keep in mind that there are articles in the same GAN category waiting without a reviewer since January, so a paused review is mild in comparison. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I know, I just figured that a GAN without a reviewer is better than a GAN with a reviewer who abandoned it. Thanks for the reply, I'll look forward to working with you.--ɱ (talk) 23:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zan, hope all is well with you and that you're enjoying your summer. I appreciate your GA review of the Kuwaiti co-production; am working on it now. After it's done, would you mind looking at my recent FAC, which happens to yet another Sesame Street article? [3] I must say, it's a very cool article about an aspect of The Show not many people are aware of, so I'm sure you'll enjoy. Thanks as always. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just finished the GAC, thought you'd like to know. ;) Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zanimum. You suggested I start up the FAC for Katy Perry ASAP if I wanted her to be "Today's Featured Article" for her 30th birthday this October, so I've gone ahead and nominated her. Feel free to leave input. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 02:51, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the feedback. She does seem to have been an interesting person. I had no plans to nominate for GA, but if it were nominated would try to respond to any queries. I think it is reasonably accurate as far as it goes but there are large gaps, e.g. nothing about her parents. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've posted here to ask you for continuing the GA review on Walt Disney Animation Studios. Please do continue giving me the precious comments so that it can eventually pass!Forbidden User (talk) 15:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

This appears to be a chronic problem; please don't take on more reviews than you can handle. If you can't respond to reviews within a week, don't bother reviewing. (In relation to the Scarborough School GA review)--ɱ (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your fair and comprehensive review of Ms. Marvel (Kamala Khan)!-- TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
731		PBS Kids (talk)						Add sources
10		Kingdom Coaster (talk)						Add sources
15		Shoppers World Brampton (talk)						Add sources
62		Leland Stottlemeyer (talk)						Add sources
370		Brampton (talk)						Add sources
12		Mr. Monk Gets Jury Duty (talk)						Add sources
187		The Lion King (franchise) (talk)						Cleanup
21		Tattoo (Star Trek: Voyager) (talk)						Cleanup
43		Leon Eisenberg (talk)						Cleanup
752		Mississauga (talk)						Expand
8		Oakville (electoral district) (talk)						Expand
1,286		Disney Infinity (talk)						Expand
193		Nick Jr. (block) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
133		David and Goliath (book) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,381		Soul Eater (manga) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
15		Sesame Street Emmy awards and nominations (talk)						Merge
13		Baristas (talk)						Merge
27		Postmedia News (talk)						Merge
532		Snow White (Disney) (talk)						Wikify
207		Toronto Transit Commission (talk)						Wikify
3		Event winners at the 2012 Summer Paralympics (talk)						Wikify
5		Alchemy (event) (talk)						Orphan
5		11 U.S.C. §1113 – Rejection of Collective Bargaining Agreements (talk)						Orphan
2		Adam-Pierre de La Grené (talk)						Orphan
305		Évelyne Brochu (talk)						Stub
4		Brampton Centre (talk)						Stub
4		Anglican Diocese of Moosonee (talk)						Stub
381		MOJO (talk)						Stub
0		Mississauga West (provincial electoral district) (talk)						Stub
9		Dufferin—Caledon (provincial electoral district) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

07:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey Zanimum! Hope all is well. Late last month, you offered to review David Hudson (pioneer) for GA status. Absolutely no rush or anything (I can tell you're busy), but just wanted to shoot a ping and ask if you're still planning on reviewing it? Miniapolis also did a nice job copyediting it over the last few days. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:11, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

07:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Zan,

Would you mind reviewing another Sesame Street co-production for GAC, Plaza Sesamo? I unfortunately wasn't able to find as many sources as Iftah Ya Simsim, which you reviewed for GA, but I still think it's a charming little article. I'd really appreciate it; I'd really like to make the finals for the Wikicup this year, so your review would help me fulfill that personal goal. Thanks so much. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 02:38, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
11,463		Big Brother 16 (U.S.) (talk)						Add sources
17		Cooksville, Ontario (talk)						Add sources
13		New Democratic Party candidates, 2008 Canadian federal election (talk)						Add sources
80		Silly Symphony (talk)						Add sources
17		Ontario general election, 1999 (talk)						Add sources
9		Shara'a Simsim (talk)						Add sources
329		Conservative Party of Canada (talk)						Cleanup
9		Streetsville Secondary School (talk)						Cleanup
72,353		Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (talk)						Cleanup
110		Soviet manned lunar programs (talk)						Expand
557		Dancing with the Stars (talk)						Expand
7		Disability classification in golf (talk)						Expand
134		Hazel McCallion (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
462		Sail (song) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,018		Sitcom (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
73		Bambam (singer) (talk)						Merge
1,254		Looney Tunes (talk)						Merge
23		Fox Theater, Westwood Village (talk)						Merge
5		New Jagannath Sadak (talk)						Wikify
9		If I Can't Love Her (talk)						Wikify
3		David Hutcheon (talk)						Wikify
4		Sesame Street licensing (talk)						Orphan
31		SmartTrack (talk)						Orphan
3		D. G. Leahy (talk)						Orphan
8		Toronto Golf Club (talk)						Stub
4		Dixie, Mississauga (talk)						Stub
10		Erindale, Mississauga (talk)						Stub
9		Whitney Matheson (talk)						Stub
27		United Dairy Farmers (talk)						Stub
116		Saint Raymond (musician) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hey, just wanted to check in and see if you were still planning to review ON 407. I'm guessing it just got lost in your watchlist and that I'd attempt here. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 13:47, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The guy has a habit of accepting GAN reviews and then ignoring them, you're gonna have to find someone else. See earlier comments on his talk for proof.--ɱ (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

09:33, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

08:34, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolas Moreau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Moreau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 01:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hero Muller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero Muller until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. j⚛e decker^talk 19:49, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

09:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

FYI: [57]. CC.

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup - September 2014 Welcome to the GA Cup! In less than 72 hours, the competition will begin! Before you all start reviewing nominations we want to make sure you understand the following: This is a friendly competition so we don't want any cheating/breaking of the rules. However, if you do believe someone is going against the rules, notify the judges. All the rules are listed here. If you are a new editor or new to reviewing Good article nominations, it is imperative that you read the 4 essays/guides listed under FAQ #4. If you do not understand something, ask a judge for clarification ASAP! The competition is not entirely about who can review the most nominations. Per the "Scoring" page, there is different criteria in which you can earn more points. Theoretically, you could review 10 nominations and have 80 points but another user could have reviewed 5 nominations and have 100 points. Yes, we want you to review as many nominations as you can as this will greatly increase the number of points you earn, but you must also keep in mind that every single review will be looked over by a judge. If we find that you are "rubber-stamping" (in other words, the review is not complete but you still passed/failed the article) you may be disqualified without warning. Also, rather than creating a long list on what to remember, make sure you have read the "Scoring", "Submissions", and "FAQ" pages. Now for the one question that we guarantee you have: how on earth will the rounds work??? Yes, we never actually had a solid platform regarding how the rounds would work because we had no idea how many people would sign-up. Even though the competition is about to begin, because sign-ups are still open, it is impossible to say exactly how each round will work. As of now, we can confirm that Round 1 will have everyone compete in one big pool. Depending on the final number of participants after sign-ups close, a to-be-determined number of participants will move on (highest scorers will move on) to Round 2. We guarantee that the top 15 will move on, so make sure you aim for those top positions! Moving on to Round 2, participants will be split into pools of even numbers (for example, every pool will have 6 participants). The pools will be determined by a computer program that places participants by random. More details regarding Round 2 will be sent out at the end of Round 1. It is important to note that the GA Cup will run on UTC time, so make sure you know what time that is for where you live! On that note, the GA Cup will start on October 1 at 0:00:01 UTC; Round 1 will end on October 29 at 23:59:59 UTC; Round 2 will commence on November 1 at 0:00:01 UTC. All reviews must be started after or on the start time of the round. If you qualify for Round 2 but do not complete a review before the end of Round 1, the review can be carried over to Round 2; however that review will not count for Round 1. Prior to the start of the the second round, participants who qualify to move on will be notified. Finally, if you know anyone else that might be interesting in participating, let them know! Sign-ups close on October 15 so there is still plenty of time to join in on the action! If you have any further questions, contact one of the judges or leave a message here. On October 16 or 17, 2014, check the Pools page as we will post the exact number of participants that will move on to the next round. Because this number will be determined past the halfway mark of Round 1, we encourage you to aim to be in the top 15 as the top 15 at the end of the round are guaranteed to move on. Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

09:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi! I am very pleased to see that you have started reviewing the GAN I placed on Fancy (Iggy Azalea song), and would like you to review a nomination I placed which is taking too long, and it is Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Thanks! :) DEW. Adrenaline (Nahnah4) 09:17, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
26		Buddy Cole (character) (talk)						Add sources
616		Katie Morgan (talk)						Add sources
20		History of Brampton (talk)						Add sources
1,384		Disney Channel (talk)						Add sources
10,099		Syrian Civil War (talk)						Add sources
34		Brampton Transit (talk)						Add sources
65		Warren County, Ohio (talk)						Cleanup
1,165		C++11 (talk)						Cleanup
12		North Park Secondary School (talk)						Cleanup
22		System Deployment Image (talk)						Expand
10		New Democratic Party candidates, 2004 Canadian federal election (talk)						Expand
6		Brampton Fall Fair (talk)						Expand
2,165		M*A*S*H (TV series) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
48		Can You Tell Me How to Get to Sesame Street? (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
23		Finch Avenue (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
2		Bramalea Tennis Club (talk)						Merge
8		Regional Enhanced Program (talk)						Merge
64		You're the One (EP) (talk)						Merge
25		Just compensation (talk)						Wikify
3		Jakub Krako (talk)						Wikify
17,501		Meghan Trainor (talk)						Wikify
4		Peter Loftin (talk)						Orphan
16		Aquatots (talk)						Orphan
1		Abigail Lazkoz (talk)						Orphan
132		Bonnie Crombie (talk)						Stub
19		Bournville College (talk)						Stub
184		Lei Jun (talk)						Stub
7		Ottawa—Orléans (provincial electoral district) (talk)						Stub
8		Brampton Arts Council (talk)						Stub
714		Taron Egerton (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:47, 4 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I noticed that you are a major user in good article nominee reviewing, taking part in the GA Cup, and suggest you to review the Tim Frazier article. I have put a lot of effort into writing nearly the whole article, and would like to see what changes it may need in order to achieve good article status. Temple of the Mousy (talk) 15:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup - Round 1 As we move into the middle of Round 1, we wanted to report some of the lessons we've learned thus far, as well as announce a major rule change going into Round 2, which begins November 1. Remember, sign-ups for this year's Cup ends on September 15. Thus far, we're very happy with the results of the competition. One of our major goals, reducing the long backlog at GAN, is well on the way to being accomplished, mostly due to the enthusiastic efforts of Jonas Vinther, who has earned over 250 points. Over 80 reviews have been made thus far. Thank you all for your efforts and for your part in making the GA Cup a success. However, this is the inaugural year of the GA Cup, so there have been some unforeseen circumstances that have come up. One has been a glaring inadequacy with the rules, which the judges feel makes the competition unfair. As a result, there will be a major change in the rules, starting at the beginning of Round 2: Your review must provide feedback/suggestions for improvement, and then you must wait until the nominator has responded and all issues/suggestions have been resolved before you can pass the article. Failure to follow this rule will result in disqualification. What this means is that you must provide some feedback to the article's nominator, and must wait for him or her to respond before passing the article. If the nominator has not responded in the standard 7 days, you can fail the article. We're instituting this rule change to prevent the possibility of competitors passing articles for the sake of passing articles (or failing them) and to gain more points. We believe that the change will make it more fair to all competitors in the GA Cup. Also, in case you haven't noticed, we increased the "guarantee" for Round 2 to 25 participants. The exact number will be decided in the near future. We thank your for your participation, and for your flexibility and understanding as we learn what works and what doesn't work in this competition. Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

08:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for the recent reviews of my GANs. Legobot had a bit of a coughing fit over the Uncanny Tales GA; see here. As a result your GA review count is now very impressive. I don't know if you can just reset this manually or would have to poke the bot operator, but I thought I should let you know. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Haha. I was just going to leave this same note. We should just leave it until Zanium has more GA reviews than there are GAs. :P Protonk (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oh boy! Since the glitch happened after the GA Cup started, do they count for that? I saw the talk page bot error discussion your referenced, but I'm not sure what to revert the number to, so maybe I'll just strike it out for now. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Next week's newsletter: "Zanimum is in the lead with PHP_INT_MAX points!" Also if legobot is just incrementing a number striking it or turning it into something that won't cast to an integer will probably cause it to flub again. Ahhhh...bots. Protonk (talk) 22:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup - Round 1 Hello GA Cup competitors! The judges have learned a great deal in this first part of the competition, and we appreciate your patience with us as we've figured out what works and what doesn't work. As we reported in our last newsletter, an inadequacy in the scoring system has been illuminated in the past 15 days, which has resulted in a major change in the rules. It has also resulted in one withdrawal. To ensure fairness, we've decided to further increase the number of participants moving onto Round 2. Everyone who has reviewed at least one article will automatically be moved forward, and will be placed in pools. You have until October 29 to take advantage of this opportunity. It is our hope that this will make up for the unforeseen glitch in our scoring system. Best of wishes to all of you as you continue to help improve articles and make Wikipedia a better place. Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peel Region municipal elections, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John McKay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

According to User:GA bot/Stats, you went from 130 to 200+ reviews in a day. @Legoktm and Legobot: What is going on? - NickGibson3900 ^Talk 09:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

See the section just above about the GA Review count, and the discussion linked from there, for an explanation. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:28, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm questioning the mark "Good Article" of the Fursuit. Since you were one of those who contributed to it, I ask your opinion. Keplerbr (talk) 05:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Keplerbr: Replied on the GAR. Thanks for alerting me. -- Zanimum (talk) 16:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Zanimum: Seems there is no other people interested in it... And then? Keplerbr (talk) 20:33, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

13:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

I just did the fixes. I've been really busy, sorry for the delay. Could you double check it? ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've just checked on the good articles talk page whether I can simply reopen the GA1, or whether you officially have to renominate the article, and I quick pass the GA2. Doesn't seem worth it to start a GA2, when all issues have been addressed less than an hour after I closed the GA1. -- Zanimum (talk) 15:19, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

No worries, thanks for taking the review.--GDuwenTell me! 17:53, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

All done, ready for a second look.--GDuwenTell me! 16:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just wanted to remind you that the review is still open (no need to hurry, I can see by your talk page that you're a busy user). Thanks again for reviewing the article!--GDuwenTell me! 19:00, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I see you posted the Canadian shooting at ITN. Traditionally, moving something to the main page includes closing its nomination at WP:ITNC and resetting the timer. I guess you weren't aware of that. I've done it for you on this occasion. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

You also replaced the image without shifting "(pictured)" to the correct item. More importantly, you didn't upload a local copy of the image, as stressed in the yellow banner with a red "ATTENTION" heading and blinking "stop" symbol. (And for some reason, you mislabeled the edit "minor" and included no summary, thereby reducing the likelihood of another administrator noticing the errors immediately.)

Fortunately, KrinkleBot cascade-protected the image at Commons approximately four minutes later. This sometimes takes hours to occur, even when the bot is operational. (There have been several outages – including one earlier this month, during which a vandal replaced a photograph appearing on the main page with this (warning: NSFW pornography).

To be clear, I'm sure that you had only good intentions. Also, I realize that you're Canadian (and I don't mean to be insensitive or uncaring). But I respectfully request that you not edit a main page section without first familiarizing yourself with its established process. Thank you. —David Levy 18:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

@The Rambling Man: Thank you! -- Zanimum (talk) 18:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

@David Levy: Point taken. I was just trying to be bold and get something up there. I apologize for not following procedure–I'm frankly unsure I've edited the template since 2006–but it was mostly an attempt to end the conversation, given that consensus seemed stably favourable, yet no one was taking action. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I saw you're an experienced GA reviewer and I was wondering if you'd be kind enough to review Kajaani (a Finnish municipality) for me. I have had one GA in the past (Mikkeli, another Finnish municipality). If you don't want to or don't have time to that's fine. :) Regards, --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 18:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

@AmaryllisGardener: Thanks for the offer, but I don't think I'd end up passing it. You'd be better off waiting and seeing whether someone else would be more apt. The history and economy sections are strong, but you need more meat on much of the article. The river allows fishing, but is there any source talking about how it interacts with the human population? Did the town grow around the river initially, before expanding to its modern borders? Are the roads a linear grid, or at various angles from the different eras of growth? The theatre: does it host outside acts, or are there local bands or theatre troupes? Or a mix of both? Are the recreation facilities municipally owned/managed, or private? What about the Hokki Kajaani, or any other intracity leagues that have teams in town? It's a foundation for an article, but not ready just yet. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I'll try to fix these problems. Thanks anyway. :) --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 22:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just wanted to give you a heads up. It's almost a month now. Thanks!  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 18:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article The Hole in the Fence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Worthy but non-notable book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've fixed up some things in regards to the GA review. Étienne Dolet (talk) 07:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Movie dvd cover the hound of baskerville.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hey Zanimum! A few months back, you expressed interest in reviewing my GA nom, David Hudson (pioneer). Was just curious is this still interested you - perfectly fine if not, I know you're busy. Thank you! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:19, 30 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wilhelmina Will has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! '"On Psych, A USA Network TV series Episode 8, The Tao of Gus, Season 6, Shawn refers to pumpkins as "Halloween Apples" because he thinks all round fruits are a type of apple. If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

Cheers! "We could read for-EVER; reading round the wiki!" (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup - Round 2 Greetings, GA Cup competitors! Wednesday saw the end of Round 1. Jaguar took out Round 1 with an amazing score of 238. In a tight race for second, Peacemaker67 and Ritchie333 finished second and third with 152 and 141 points, respectively. Two users have scored the maximum five bonus points for article length (60,000 characters+). Anotherclown reviewed Spanish conquest of Yucatán (77,350 characters) and MrWooHoo reviewed Communist Party of China (76,740 characters). The longest review was by Bilorv who reviewed Caldas da Rainha. The review was approximately 22,400 characters which earned s/he two bonus points (20, 000 - 29, 999 characters). In Round 1, 117 reviews were completed, making the first round of the GA Cup a success! A total of 86 articles were removed from the backlog during the month of October! We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 2 so we can lower the backlog as much as possible. To qualify for the second round, one completed review was needed, which 28 users accomplished. Participants have been randomly put into 7 pools of 4; the top 2 in each pool will move onto Round 3. There will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 15th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 2 will start on November 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on November 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 2 and the pools can be found here Also, remember that a major rule change will go into affect starting on November 1, which marks the beginning of Round Two. Round 1 displayed a weakness in the rules, which we are correcting with this new rule. We believe that this change will make the competition more inherently fair. The new rule is: Your review must provide feedback/suggestions for improvement, and then you must wait until the nominator has responded and all issues/suggestions have been resolved before you can pass the article. Failure to follow this rule will result in disqualification. The judges will strictly enforce this new rule. Good luck and remember to have fun! Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

17:28, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Please come up with your decision. Thanks,  ΤheQ Editor  ^Talk? 16:39, 4 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

15:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Zanimum. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "C. A. Irvine".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:C. A. Irvine}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GamerPro64 23:06, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

I saw Talk:Pig Bride/GA1 after I returned and did the fixes, but you missed my ping I guess. I cleaned up the issues and renominated it, but because you had to fail it due to inactivity, I was hoping you could review it again. It only makes sense because you reviewed it originally and sense you are now familiar with the page. I remade the Good Article nomination and you can see it on Talk:Pig Bride. Hope to hear from you soon. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

18:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Are you going to finish this review? Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:48, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

A note to Zanimum that this GAN review, which you started on September 2, will be closed unless you return to finish it (or start to finish it) the next time you edit, or November 22, whichever is earlier. It is grossly unfair to the nominator to have this level of delay, and it's something that has happened time and time again with your GA reviews. (If the nominator insists, we may close it sooner, to get it into the reviewing pool sooner.) You also have the following other GAN reviews awaiting your attention:

• Talk:Loving You (1957 film)/GA1 (opened October 1; partial review on October 20; fixes posted the next day not yet replied to)
• Talk:Charles Aznavour/GA1 (opened October 7; fixes posted on October 14 have yet to be replied to)
• Talk:Aim for the Ace!/GA1 (opened October 20)
• Talk:Katherine Pulaski/GA1 (opened October 20 but not yet started)

I'd like to suggest that you delete the Katherine Pulaski nomination, since it's been nearly a month since you opened it. I'll be putting it back into the reviewing pool if you haven't done so by the time the Missisauga is closed. I'd like to suggest that you voluntarily limit yourself to one or maybe two reviews at any one time, since it's clear you cannot handle more in a timely manner. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

While you've done some really good reviews of GAN's, Zanimum, I have to agree with BlueMoonset that you shouldn't review so many at once- especially when not able to keep up with them all. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Agree with Blue. You've been told many times to stop taking on a bunch at once when you usually abandon the majority of them. I don't want to start enforcing a restriction on you but clearly we're going to have to. Wizardman 04:16, 21 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Zanimum, I see you've posted here once today. It's been a week since the above, and you've remained inactive except for that post. Of the five reviews listed above, Missisauga was closed at the (discouraged) nominator's request, Charles Aznavour was put back in the to-be-reviewed pool, and Katherine Pulaski was deleted, putting it back in the pool as well. This is to inform you that remaining two will join them in the pool shortly, unless you take action on them. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:12, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Zanimum. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Summer Mortimer at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 21:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Miniapolis: Thank you so much, I'm very appreciative! -- Zanimum (talk) 19:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
14		Out to Lunch (TV program) (talk)						Add sources
3		Brampton South (provincial electoral district) (talk)						Add sources
79		Conversion rate optimization (talk)						Add sources
7,680		Pakistan (talk)						Add sources
7		A. Grenville and William Davis Courthouse (talk)						Add sources
11		Gurbax Singh Malhi (talk)						Add sources
53		Captain Underpants and the Revolting Revenge of the Radioactive Robo-Boxers (talk)						Cleanup
129		Fantasmic! (talk)						Cleanup
9		Health in Toronto (talk)						Cleanup
6		Canadian federal election results in Brampton, Mississauga and Oakville (talk)						Expand
783		Five Eyes (talk)						Expand
12		LaFontaine (talk)						Expand
276		Bert and Ernie (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
611		Swing (Java) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
864		Ryan Seacrest (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
36		Ed, Edd n Eddy specials (talk)						Merge
576		Britney Jean (talk)						Merge
250		Ripping (talk)						Merge
14		Fantaghirò 2 (talk)						Wikify
42		Todd Strasser (talk)						Wikify
26		Bridgepoint Health (talk)						Wikify
6		Toonix (talk)						Orphan
6		Annapurna High School (talk)						Orphan
1		Albert Doguzov (talk)						Orphan
5		The Asian Entrepreneur (talk)						Stub
4		Brampton North (provincial electoral district) (talk)						Stub
3		Brampton City Hall (talk)						Stub
1,271		Nexus 6 (talk)						Stub
8		10 Peel Centre Drive (talk)						Stub
12		Mickey Moore (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply